Tag: Securities Regulation

  • Offering of Debentures: SEBI’s Order in the Sahara Case

    Earlier this week, SEBI issued an order restraining two entities of the Sahara group as well as certain promoters and directors from accessing the capital markets. While Sahara Prime City Limited had filed its draft red herring prospectus (DRHP) with SEBI in connection with its proposed IPO, SEBI received complaints that its group companies Sahara…

    Read more…

  • Disclosure as an Instrument of Securities Regulation

    The almost universally accepted strategy for securities regulation is to require issuers to make adequate disclosures in offering documents. The role of the regulators is to determine the extent of disclosures required. It is then left to investors to rely upon the disclosures and to make a decision as to whether to invest or not.…

    Read more…

  • Changes to Capital Markets Regulations

    On October 25, 2010, SEBI announced a number of changes to regulations governing capital markets. 1. Public offerings. A new regime is being established for IPOs by insurance companies. Rather than issue a new set of guidelines for that industry, SEBI has decided to apply the ICDR Regulations, 2009 along with additional industry-specific disclosures such…

    Read more…

  • Disclosures on Management Changes

    The saga involving the removal of SKS Microfinance’s chief executive raises a number of issues relating to corporate governance as well as securities regulation. One such issue pertains to the nature of public disclosures made regarding the removal of the chief executive, which acquires prominence considering SKS is a public listed company. Circumstances that have…

    Read more…

  • SEBI Order on MCX Stock Exchange

    SEBI yesterday issued a detailed order rejecting the application of MCX-SX to commence trading in several exchange segments. The background of the case and the gist of SEBI’s order are available at Business Standard and Livemint. SEBI’s conclusion is based on a legal analysis (a fairly intensive one for a regulator) of various issues as…

    Read more…

  • Barclays Order: ODI Restrictions Lifted by SEBI

    In December 2009, we had discussed SEBI’s order whereby Barclays was found to have failed in complying with certain disclosure norms while issuing offshore derivative instruments (ODIs) under the SEBI (Foreign Institutional Investors) Regulations, 1995. For this, SEBI had prohibited Barclays from issuing, subscribing or otherwise transacting in any ODIs until reporting systems are put…

    Read more…

  • Participatory Notes Fall in Popularity

    After initially cracking down in 2007 on indirect investment routes such as those using participatory notes (P-notes), SEBI a year later reversed its decision and allowed foreign investors to participate in the Indian markets through P-notes. SEBI’s decision to allow P-notes was the subject-matter of critique on this Blog as it raises questions regarding transparency.…

    Read more…

  • Extending Securities Regulation to the Fourth Estate

    A free and active press generally provides impetus for instilling enhanced corporate governance practices in any economy, as it does in India. However, conflicts of interest that the media faces may create distorted incentives that dilute these objectives. One such conflict is presented by the concept of “private treaties” whereby media enterprises take stakes in…

    Read more…

  • Governments as Issuers of Securities

    As we have been constantly focusing on this Blog (here, here and here), public sector enterprises (PSEs) in India that are substantially owned by the Government often take advantage of relaxations and special dispensations from the applicability of securities laws and corporate governance norms that otherwise apply in their entirety to their private sector counterparts.…

    Read more…

  • Relaxation of Free Float Requirement

    Earlier, on June 4, 2010, the Ministry of Finance introduced a requirement that all listed companies must have a public shareholding of 25%. This was to bring about uniformity and create a level playing field for all listed companies, and was the result of detailed deliberations that spanned several years. Although the rule was met…

    Read more…