TagCompanies Act

Analysis of the Strike-Off Provisions under the Companies Act, 2013

[Utsav Mitra is a 3rd year B.A. L.L.B student from The National Law Institute University, Bhopal] Strike Off is a method prescribed under sections 248-252 of the Companies Act, 2013 (the “Act”). These provisions have been notified by the Ministry of Corporate Affairs by way of a notification dated 26 December 2016. They provide an opportunity for defunct companies to get their names removed from...

Supreme Court on Delay in Filing Appeal from Orders of the NCLT

[Maneck Mulla is the Proprietor of M Mulla Associates, Mumbai] In Bengal Chemists and Druggist Association Vs Kalyan Chowdhury, the Supreme Court discussed the provisions of section 421 of the Companies Act, 2013 (the Act) which provides for filing of an appeal from orders of the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) within a period of 45 days with a further grace period of 45 days, (i.e. 90...

Briefing on Stakeholder Responsibility of Corporate Boards

The NSE Centre for Excellence in Corporate Governance (CECG) has issued its most recent quarterly briefing titled Stakeholder Responsibility of Corporate Boards, which has been authored by Mihir Naniwadekar and myself. The executive summary is as follows: – The interests of stakeholders (besides shareholders) have become quite prominent to necessitate their recognition by corporate boards;...

A Curious Case of ‘Public Interest’ in Indian Corporate Law

[Abhijeet Singh Rawaley is a Bar Council of India Trust Scholar and a III Year B.A., LL.B. (Hons.) Candidate at NALSAR, Hyderabad With inputs from Shreenath A. Khemka, a King’s Law Scholar pursuing an LLM at the University of Cambridge] This post comments on section 396 of the [Indian] Companies Act, 1956 (carried forward as section 237 in the Companies Act, 2013). The comment critiques the...

Harmonization of Insider Trading Norms and the Companies Act

[Ankit Handa and Arunima Vijay are 3rd year (VI Semester) B.A., LL.B. (Hons.) students at National Law University in Jodhpur] The Companies Amendment Act 2017 (“CAA ‘17”) has been notified by the Ministry of Corporate Affairs (“MCA”) on 3 January 2018. One of the major aims of harmonisation with the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act 1992 (“SEBI Act”) and regulations made thereunder is...

NCLAT on Public Interest in an Amalgamation Scheme

[Jai Bajpai is a 3rd year student at School of Legal Studies, University of Petroleum and Energy Studies, Dehradun] Introduction The element of public interest in amalgamation schemes has remained a fairly unexplored territory in the Indian corporate law regime. In essence, an amalgamation scheme ought to be beneficial to each and every class of shareholders and creditors and also in public...

Companies (Amendment) Act, 2017: Loans to Directors

[Utsav Mitra is a 3rd year, B.A. LLB Hons student at The National Law Institute University, Bhopal] The granting of loans to, and security and guarantees provided on behalf of, directors and other interested parties of the directors is governed by section 185 of the Companies Act, 2013. However, this is a widely criticised section, being too prohibitive in nature as compared to the corresponding...

Condonation of Delay Scheme, 2018: A Relief to Defaulting Directors and Companies

[Tanaya Desai is a 4th-year student at ILS Law College, Pune] In a bid to constrict and prevent illicit fund flows and black money by shell companies, the Ministry of Corporate Affairs (“MCA”) last year disqualified over 300,000 directors for default in filing company annual returns and financial statements with the Registrar of Companies (“RoC”), a statutory mandate prescribed by the Companies...

Revisiting Arbitrability of Claims of Oppression and Mismanagement: A Singapore Perspective

[Aishwarya Singh is a 4th year student at Jindal Global Law School] The Bombay High Court (HC) in the case of Rakesh Malhotra v. Rajinder Kumar Malhotra (2014) had held that oppression and mismanagement claims are not arbitrable because the arbitral tribunal does not have the power to grant all the statutory reliefs available in a minority oppression claim. On the other hand, the Singapore Court...

Interpreting the Restriction on Layering of Subsidiaries

[Mayank Labh is a 4th year student at NALSAR University of Law] The Ministry of Corporate Affairs recently notified the Companies (Restriction on Number of Layers) Rules, 2017 (the “Rules”) on 20 September 2017. Much has been debated (here, here and here) on how the Rules affect genuine business structuring of companies and the unnecessary burden and costs it imposes on companies. In this post, I...

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Recent Posts

Topics

Recent Comments

Archives

web analytics