Recent news reports (here, here and here) have highlighted a shareholder proposal that has been initiated in preparation for the annual general meeting of Alembic Limited to be held on 28 July 2017. The shareholder in question is Unifi Capital Private Limited who is said (though not verified) to be holding 3% shares in Alembic. The proposal involves the election of a “small shareholder” director...
Bombay High Court on the Permissibility of Shareholder Representative Suits
Bar & Bench yesterday reported that the Bombay High Court denied leave to certain shareholders of various Tata group companies to bring a representative suit that made certain legal claims in the aftermath of the ouster of Mr. Cyrus Mistry from the board of Tata Sons as well as other Tata group companies. The order of the court in Pramod Premchand Shah v. Rata Tata is now available. Facts and...
Minimizing the Liability of Directors: SEBI’s Order in the Zylog Case
[Guest post by Amitabh Robin Singh, who is a corporate lawyer practising in Mumbai] Liability of directors is a sensitive topic in India, particularly for foreign investors who propose to nominate directors to the boards of their Indian investee companies. That is why clauses are inserted in shareholders’ agreements to the effect that the investor’s nominee director will not be identified...
SAT Order in the Satyam Case
In July 2014, we had discussed the order of the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) then passed against several members of Satyam’s senior management for their role in perpetrating the colossal financial fraud involving the company. In its order, SEBI found several individuals guilty of violating various regulations issued by SEBI, and restrained them from accessing the capital markets...
Ascertaining Legal Ramifications of Compensation Agreements- Part II (Statutory Approach)
[The following post, the second in a series, is contributed by Rahul Sibal, a third year student of NALSAR Hyderabad. In the series, he analyzes possible liabilities that may arise with respect to compensation agreements from different perspectives. He can be contacted at [email protected]. In this second post, he attempts to ascertain the liability of directors that have entered into...
Ascertaining Legal Ramifications of Compensation Agreements – Part I (Common Law Approach)
[The following post, the first in a series, is contributed by Rahul Sibal, a third year student of NALSAR Hyderabad. He analyzes possible liabilities that may arise with respect to compensation agreements from different perspectives. He can be contacted at [email protected]. In the following post, he attempts to ascertain the liability of directors, who have entered into compensation...
Calls for Socially Responsible Investing
The concept of socially responsible investing (SRI) suggests that investors would invest in companies that are acting in socially and environmentally responsible ways, and that such investors would exit from investments in businesses that do not comport with environmental, social and governance (ESG) criteria. Such investors maintain a balance between financial sustainability and social impact...
Stewardship Code for Insurance Companies
Historically, the passivity of institutional investors in India has led to less than significant monitoring of managements and controlling shareholders of companies. However, as I had noted in an earlier paper, the Indian markets began witnessing greater levels of shareholder activism in more recent years. Among the regulatory efforts that have engendered activism, one relates to a 2010 circular...
Shareholding Thresholds for Oppression and Class Actions
The Tata-Mistry episode has brought into focus the minimum shareholding threshold required for a minority shareholder to bring an action for oppression and mismanagement under sections 241 to 244 of the Companies Act, 2013. In a piece in Bloomberg Quint titled Minority Shareholder Protection as a Numbers Game, I examine the implications of such shareholding thresholds that operate as a filter...
NCLT Rules on Maintainability in the Tata-Mistry Case
Background The action on the legal front in the Tata-Mistry episode has been playing out in the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) over the last few weeks. This is on account of an action for oppression and mismanagement initiated by two Mistry companies (the Mistry Group) that are shareholders of Tata Sons against the company as well as its directors and officers. The action was brought under...
Recent Comments