[Megha Shaw is an advocate practising in the Supreme Court of India and Sachdev Sharma is a law graduate of NUJS, Kolkata] In Rohan Builders (India) Private Limited v. Berger Paints India Limited (12 September 2024), a division bench of the Supreme Court of India decided on whether an application for extension of time under section 29A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (the “A & C...
NCLT’s Shift: A Deeper Dive into Merger Schemes and Public Interest
[Arjim Jain and Shruti Asati are 4th Year B.A., LL.B. (Hons.) students at National Law University, Odisha] In a ruling in July, the National Company Law Tribunal (‘NCLT/Tribunal’) rejected a proposed merger scheme involving three interconnected entities, citing concerns that the scheme was not in the public interest. Unlike other cases where the NCLT typically focused on ensuring compliance with...
Are OLA Drivers Employees or Contractors? Karnataka High Court Weighs In
[Aparna Ravi is a Partner and Manan Sheth an Associate at S&R Associates] In its judgement dated September 30, 2024 in Ms. X v. Internal Complaints Committee, ANI Technologies Private Limited (Writ Petition No. 8127 of 2019), the Karnataka High Court held that the relationship between ANI Technologies Private Limited (“OLA”) and its driver subscribers was an employer-employee relationship...
Identifying the Real SBO: A critique of the LinkedIn and Samsung Orders
[Chirag Motwani and Ananya Badaya are 4th year law students at Hidayatullah National Law University, Raipur] A “significant beneficial owner” (“SBO”) is an individual who directly or indirectly controls a company or substantially holds beneficial interest in the company and whose name is not registered as a holder of shares in the books of the company. Section 90 of the Companies Act, 2013...
Protection against Self-incrimination and Section 217 of the Companies Act, 2013: Navigating Constitutional Waters
[Shriya Chakravarthy and Mrigank Pathak are alumni of Gujarat National Law University, Gandhinagar, and have previously served as Law Clerks at the Supreme Court of India. They are presently practising at the High Court of Karnataka and the Supreme Court of India respectively] Under the Companies Act, 2013 (“the Act”), the procedures for inspection, inquiry, and investigation have been laid down...
Can an Exclusive Jurisdiction Clause Designate Seat?
[Shaneen Parikh is the Partner and Head of International Arbitration at Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas. Amoga Krishnan is a Senior Associate at Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas] Can an exclusive jurisdiction clause be treated as one which also determines the seat of arbitration? In May 2024, the Delhi High Court (“DHC”) in Kings Chariot v. Tarun Wadhwa ruled in the negative. This post is a comment on the...
Reining in Overreach: Why BPSPs Should Not Be Classified as Payment Systems
[Ritvij Ratn Tiwari is a 5th-year B.A., LL.B. (Hons.) student at the National Law School of India University, Bengaluru] In February 2024, the Reserve Bank of India (‘RBI’) moved decisively to curtail the operations of certain fintech companies, particularly Business Payment Service Providers (‘BPSPs’), by labelling their activities as unauthorized “payment systems” under the Payment...
Clarifying “Unconditional” Withdrawals: When Does Interest on Awarded Amounts Truly Stop?
[Ashish Dholakia is a Senior Advocate at the Delhi High Court, Rohan Chawla is an Advocate at the Delhi High Court, and Ria Bansal is a 4th-year B.A., LL.B. (Hons.) student at Rajiv Gandhi National University of Law] The 2015 amendments to the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 (‘A&C Act’) dramatically changed the arbitration regime in India. A challenge to an award under section...
RBI’s Revised Master Directions on Peer-to-Peer Lending: Shift in Regulatory Policy
[Sourav Paul is a final year student at the West Bengal National University of Juridical Sciences, Kolkata] In recent years, the fintech industry in India has witnessed significant growth, particularly within the digital lending sector. A prominent example is the peer-to-peer (‘P2P’) lending model, which has expanded rapidly in India, supported by a favourable regulatory environment. P2P lending...
Navigating Legal Conundrums: The Interplay Between India’s Netting Act and the Insolvency Code
[Aditya Chhangani is a practising advocate at the Rajasthan High Court] The Bilateral Netting of Qualified Financial Contracts Act, 2020 (“Netting Act”) came into force with the goal of fostering stability and competitiveness in the Indian financial sector. In simple terms, netting means setting off any obligations or claims arising out of a Qualified Financial Contract (“QFC”). A single net...
Recent Comments