[Siddharth Kumar is a student at Vivekananda School of Law and Legal Studies, New Delhi and Aditya Prasad at Jindal Global Law School, Sonepat. They are also Editor and Associate Editor respectively of the CorpLexia Blawg] The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 has arguably been one of the foremost developments in the Indian financial laws in recent times. While the Code has proven to be (or...
Claims in Quantum Meruit vis-à-vis Damages in Breach of Contract
[Pulkit Khare and Vaidehi Soni are 4th Year B.A., LL.B. (Hons.) students of the National University of Advanced Legal Studies, Kochi] The Supreme Court recently in Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Ltd. (MTNL) v. Tata Communications Ltd. raised a question whether quasi-contractual obligations can be imported into a contract which already stipulates a sum for its breach. The case was brought about to...
Entity versus Enterprise: Dealing with Insolvency of Corporate Groups
[Vinod Kothari and Sikha Bansal are with Vinod Kothari & Company. The can be reached at [email protected]] Present-day businesses sweep across multiple entities, such that the “enterprise” consisting of multiple entities, often in multiple jurisdictions, is referred to as a “group”. While accounting standards and securities market regulators have moved on to the concept of “business...
Supreme Court on Relevance of Section 15J of SEBI Act
[Rakshita Poddar and Jitesh Maheshwari are associates at Mindspright Legal] The Supreme Court of India has recently passed a landmark judgment in Adjudicating Officer (“AO”), SEBI v. Bhavesh Pabari by which it has overruled its previous judgment in SEBI v. Roofit Industries Ltd. and explained the relevance of section 15J of the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992. The Securities and...
5th GNLU Moot on Securities and Investment Law
[Announcement on behalf of the Gujarat National Law University, Gandhinagar] Since its establishment in 2015, the GNLU Moot on Securities and Investment Law (GNLUMSIL) has garnered praise for providing a platform to students to be able to simulate challenges faced by the Indian capital markets and, at the same time, offering them a stimulating opportunity for research and learning in the domain...
Arbitrating Disputes under the Transfer of Property Act, 1882
[Abhinav Sankaranarayanan is a III year B.A.L.L.B (Hons.) student at the West Bengal National University of Juridical Sciences, Kolkata (WBNUJS)] Background On 28 February 2019, a Division Bench of the Supreme Court in Vidya Drolia v. Durga Trading Corporation revisited the convoluted jurisprudence surrounding the arbitrability of disputes governed by the provisions of the Transfer of Property...
Food Combos: Whether Single-Brand or Multi-Brand Retailing?
[Akhil Kumar is a fourth year BA LLB (Hons.) student and Ayushi Singh a third year BA LLB (Hons.) student at NUALS, Kochi] Single and Multi-Brand Retail Trading According to paragraph 5.2.1. of the Foreign Direct Investment Policy (“Policy”), foreign direct investment (“FDI”) in the manufacturing sector is permitted in India under the automatic route. Further, a manufacturer is permitted to sell...
Consideration of Improved Financial Offer in the Insolvency Resolution Process
[Varsha Gupta is a 4th-year law student at the School of Law, UPES, Dehradun] Introduction After the approval of the resolution plan of JSW Steel in the Bhushan Power & Steel Limited, Tata Steel Limited, one of the resolution applicants challenged the submission of an improved financial offer. In Tata Steel Limited v. Liberty House Group Pte. Ltd., Tata Steel Limited argued that the National...
Jaiprakash Associates Case: A Throwback to Judicial Interference in the Arbitral Process?
[Rishabh Malaviya is an Advocate at Arista Chambers, Bangalore] The Supreme Court’s recent decision in Jaiprakash Associates Ltd. v. Tehri Hydro Development Corporation India Ltd. (2019 SCC OnLine SC 143) discussed the scope of an arbitral tribunal’s power to award pendente lite interest. While the decision only reiterates the position of law laid down in several previous cases, the approach...
Double Claim by a Creditor
[Richa Saraf is a Legal Advisor at Vinod Kothari & Co.] In Dr. Vishnu Kumar Agarwal v. Piramal Enterprises Ltd. (January 2019), the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) held that multiple applications for initiation of corporate insolvency resolution process for the very same debt or claim is not permissible. Now, consider a situation where Company A (guarantor) has guaranteed the...
Recent Comments