Adoption of Indian Accounting Standards (Ind AS) by Banks, Insurance Companies and NBFCs – Effects of Transition and Potential Hurdles

[The following guest post is
contributed by Arka Saha, who is a 4th
Year B.A.LL.B. (Hons) & Executive Student in CS (ICSI) at National Law
University Odisha (NLU-O)]
To bring about systemic
convergence of financial reporting standards in vogue in the case of Indian
banking companies, Insurance companies and Non-banking Financial Companies with
those recognised and accepted globally, the Indian Government posited the
roadmap for the adoption of Indian Accounting Standards (Ind As) by these
companies on the 18 January 2016.[1]
As per the press release, scheduled commercial banks and insurance companies
have to switch over to the Ind As, which are a set of accounting standards in
concurrence with the International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) barring
certain carve-outs,  promulgated by the
Ministry of Corporate Affairs, from the period commencing from 1 April 2018.
The nature of these standards mandate a paradigm shift in the financial
reporting process for these companies and its adoption is likely to have a
drastic impact on the company’s financial statements.
Accounting Standards and the Need for Change
The Indian GAAP or the
Generally Accepted Accounting Principles area collection of pronouncements by
various regulatory authorities in India pertaining to the mode of recognition, 
measurement and disclosure of data in the books of accounts of companies.Section
211(3C) of the Companies Act, 1956, introduced by the Companies (Amendment)
Act, 1999, mandated compliance with Accounting Standards
  that were recommended by the Indian Institute
of Chartered Accountants of India (ICAI) and notified by the Central
Government. These standards, were incorporated into legislation by the
Companies (Accounting Standards) Rules, 2006 and made applicable to all
companies vide Notification G.S.R. 739(E) dated 7 December 2006.
  In 2011, the Revised Schedule VI to the
Companies Act, which contained a new format for the preparation and
presentation of financial statements as required under section 211 of the Act,
and framed as per the existing standards notified by the 2006
  rules, was issued by the Ministry of
Corporate Affairs. The coming into force of the Companies Act 2013 saw the same
standards of reporting and similar format being retained in Schedule III under
section 129.
The accounting standards
issued by the ICAI were made  applicable
to banks by the sector regulator,  the
Reserve Bank of India, vide circulars and guidelines and to Insurance companies
by the Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority (IRDA) vide IRDA
(Preparation of Financial Statements and Auditor’s Report of the Insurance
Companies) Regulations 2002. Banking companies, have to prepare their accounts
as per the format contained in the third schedule to the Banking Regulation
Act, 1949. The requirements stipulated in Schedule VI (and subsequently Schedule
III of the Companies Act 2013) relating to profit and loss account and  the balance sheet of a company also apply to
those of a banking company, unless inconsistent with the provisions of the
Banking Regulation Act.  In summary, all
kinds of companies are mandated by law to follow GAAP as set out by the ICAI
and modified by sector regulators. It is pertinent at this juncture, to note
that the Indian GAAP, being discordant with the IFRS, which are a set of
internationally recognised and accepted accounting standards promulgated by the
International Accounting Standards Board (IASB),[2]  has resulted in the lack of comparability of
Indian companies with their international counterparts across various
Adoption of IFRS confers
various advantages over the GAAP, such as cost saving by multinationals,
increased comparability between companies world-wide, increased access to
foreign capital markets in jurisdictions wherein IFRS is mandatory for listing,
improved consistency and transparency, and so on. These advantages of adopting
the IFRS were recognised by the ICAI in October 2007, with it issuing a concept
paper on convergence of accounting standards with the IFRS. The concept paper
mooted the idea of adoption of IFRS by public interest entities such as public
listed companies, banking companies and insurance companies on or after the
financial year commencing from 1 April 2011. India further reiterated its
ambition to converge extant accounting standards with the IFRS at the G20
summit in Pittsburgh in 2009 and subsequently, the Ministry of Corporate
Affairs released a roadmap ended towards the convergence of the prevailing accounting
standards with IFRS for companies, not being banking companies, insurance
companies and NBFCs, in 2010. The roadmap, posited two separate sets of standards
under Section 211(3C) of the Companies Act: one, the standards newly converged
with the IFRS, which would be applicable to certain classes of companies from
dates specified in the roadmap called Ind As, and second, the extant accounting
standards, which would be applicable to unlisted entities  having a net worth of less than Rs. 500
crores or less, and small and medium companies.
In March 2010, the Ministry of
Corporate Affairs issued a roadmap for the convergence of accounting standards
for Banking Companies, Insurance Companies and NBFCs. The Ministry of Corporate
Affairs, in 2011, placed 35 Ind ASs, converged with the IFRS on its website,
but without an implementation date. Consequently, the companies covered under
the initial roadmap of 2010 did not implement the same. The same accounting
standards continued to be in force for companies with the enactment and
subsequent notification of the Companies Act 2013.[3]
Subsequently, four more Ind
ASs were recommended by the ICAI. In 2015, these accounting standards were
notified by the Ministry of Corporate Affairs under the Companies (Indian
Accounting Standards) Rules 2015, under section 133 of the Companies Act, 2013.
The rules laid down the roadmap pertaining to the adoption of Ind ASs by
companies, but chose to leave out Banking companies, Insurance Companies and
NBFCs outside its purview. The predominant reason for the late proposed
adoption of Ind As by banks, insurance companies and NBFCs was the non
finalisation of IFRS 9, pertaining to financial instruments, which was later
issued by the IASB in July 2014.
Recent Measures
The roadmap for implementation
of Ind As by scheduled commercial banks and insurance companies notified vide a
press release dated 18 January 2016 requires all scheduled commercial banks
(barring Regional Rural Banks) , All-India Term Lending Refinancing
institutions like EXIM Bank, NABARD, SIDBI 
and NHB, and insurance companies, to prepare Ind-As based financial
statements for the financial year commencing 1 April 2018 with comparatives for
periods ending 31 March 2018. Further, regardless of the requirement under the
roadmap for Ind-As adoption by companies, the holding company, a Joint Venture
Company, subsidiaries and associate companies of a scheduled commercial bank
(excluding RRBs) will have to implement Ind-As and prepare financial statements
based on these standards for accounting periods starting from 1 April 2018,
with comparatives for periods ending 31 March 2018.
The implementation of Ind-As
by NBFCs, as per the notification is to be carried out in two phases, with
phase 1, including NBFCs with a net-worth of over Rs. 500 crores and their
holding companies, subsidiaries, Joint Venture companies and associate
companies, and commencing from the accounting period starting 1 April 2018,
with comparatives for periods ending 31 March 2018.  NBFCs covered under phase -II of
implementation of Ind-As are those having a net-worth of more than 250 crores
and less than 500 crores, NBFCs whose debt securities or equity is listed or is
to be listed in a recognised stock exchange either in India or abroad having
net worth of less than Rs. 500 crores. These NBFCs  have to present Ind-As compliant financial
statements from the accounting periods commencing 1 April 2019, with
comaparatives for periods ending 31 March 2019. The requirement of
implementation of Ind-As under this phase extends to holding companies of the
NBFCs included in phase II, their subsidiaries, associate companies and Joint
Venture companies.  The press release
further prohibits scheduled commercial banks, NBFCs and insurance companies who
do not fall under the roadmap presented from adopting Ind-As voluntarily in
order to encourage a structured and phased transition to the new standards.
However, these companies are not prohibited from providing to their parent
companies  or investor companies Ind-As
compliant financial statements, if such parent company is mandated under law to
prepare consolidated financial statements compliant with Ind-As.
It is pertinent to note that
for the companies covered in the roadmap, Ind-As is to be applicable to both
individual and consolidated financial statements. The notification also
specifically excludes Urban Cooperative Banks (UCBs) and Regional Rural banks
(RRBs) from Ind-As implementation.
of Transition
For a company moving from the
GAAP to Ind-As, requirements of Ind-As 101 have to complied with, of which the
primary requirement is the retrospective application of Ind-As, barring certain
optional and mandatory exceptions to retrospective application. It is pertinent
to note that adjustments arising from the initial application of Ind-As are to
be adjusted against the opening retained earnings of the first period and is
thus likely to negatively impact the retention ratio of implementing entities.
The earliest accounting period
for which the entities included in the roadmap have to prepare Ind-As compliant
financial statements is 1 April 2018. However, due to the requirement of having
a comparable equivalent balance sheet, Ind-As compliant accounts have to be
constructed from the period beginning 1 April 2017.The author is of the opinion
that the requirement to prepare Ind-As compliant comparatives shall give the
companies who have to prepare them mandatorily from 1 April 2017 very little
time for the same, given the lack of skilled professionals conversant with the
nitty-gritties of these converged accounting standards.
The gravest impact on Indian
banks could be due to the adoption of Ind-As 109. In a time when banks in India
are stressed due to the rising gross NPAs and weak assets, the adoption of
Ind-As 109, which proposes a paradigm shift in the accounting model for
impairment is tricky, to say the least. Indian banks traditionally, as per the
extant international standard IAS 39, require loan loss provisions to be made
upon the impairment taking place. This model has come to be widely criticised,
and in pursuance of rectifying it, Ind-As 109, which is based on IFRS 9, adopts
an “expected credit loss” framework.[4]
Under this framework, an entity is mandated to set its expected credit loss
arising out of a financial asset on the basis of “reasonable and supportable
information that is available without undue costs or effort. These include
historical, current and forecast information. [5]
The adoption of Ind-As 109
thus gives rise to three separate conundrums, one pertaining to capital
requirement, and the other pertaining to associated costs of implementation and
the third one pertaining to lack of consistence and objectivity. The Expected
Credit Loss Model, juxtaposed to the Incurred Credit Loss model currently being
followed, by virtue of relying on notions of risk of default, will require
higher provisioning for loss, which is an expense, thus affecting the opening
balance of retained earnings, and capital. 
Pertaining to the second conundrum, it is pertinent to note that the
Expected Credit Loss Model is “data intensive and necessitates fairly
sophisticated credit modelling skills”[6]
raising costs of implementation.
Thirdly, Under the Prudential
Norms on Income Recognition, Asset Classification and Provisioning pertaining
to Advances (IRACP), which Indian banks have to mandatorily follow,
provisioning requirements are based on an objective criteria, as opposed to the
subjective criterion followed under Ind-As 109. Under the extant norms,
provisioning requirements come into play as per the ’90 day rule’, whereas
under Ind – As 109, provisioning is largely dependent on management judgement.
Thus, the 
objectivity of an RBI mandated criteria and consistency among banks
is lost with adoption of Ind As 109.
The author is of the opinion
that the adoption of Ind-As, focused towards bringing accounting in India in
convergence with global standards under the IFRS, is a welcome step in spite of
all the transient issues plaguing first time adoption. It is pertinent to note
that India has chosen to converge its accounting standards with the IFRS as
against complete adoption, with certain carve-outs. The presence of these
carve-outs however, will take away some benefits of converging with the IFRS,
such as listing of securities in capital markets abroad, that require IFRS
compliance. It will also be interesting to see how the adoption of Ind-As
affects M&A activities of banks, with more NPAs now set to be provisioned
for, a move ultimately reflecting poorly on the health of such banking
– Arka Saha

[1]    Roadmap drawn-up for
implementation of Indian Accounting Standards (Ind AS) converged with
International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) for Scheduled Commercial
Banks (Excluding Rrbs), Insurers/Insurance Companies and Non-Banking Financial
Companies (NBFC’s) , Press Information Bureau , Ministry of Corporate Affairs,
Government of India, 18 January 2016 
available at
[2]    IFRS are a set of
standards, frameworks and interpretations required for the preparation of
Financial Statements. The term used herein includes the International
Accounting Standards issued by the International Accounting Standards Committee
(IASC) – the predecessor to the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB)
and all interpretations. Presently, the IFRS consists of International
Accounting Standards, International Financial Reporting Standards, Standard
Interpretations, and the International Financial Reporting Interpretations.
[3]     General Circular No.
15/2013, available at
[4]    5.5.1, Indian Accounting
Standard (Ind AS) 109, available at
[5]    5.5.11, Indian Accounting
Standard (Ind AS) 109
[6]    Report of the Working Group
on Implementation of Ind AS by Banks in India, Reserve Bank of India, 2015

About the author

Umakanth Varottil

Umakanth Varottil is an Associate Professor at the Faculty of Law, National University of Singapore. He specializes in corporate law and governance, mergers and acquisitions and cross-border investments. Prior to his foray into academia, Umakanth was a partner at a pre-eminent law firm in India.



    On a quick read through, the writer is seen to have brought to focus , among others, the common- ly known/heard of , and widely faced/experienced so called ‘potential hurdles’ in times of transition from one set of accounting norms (system) to another (such as GAAR to Ind. AS, herein) ; more particularly, any new system of the kind is potent with, expected to be adopted and followed, with a retroactive operation, that too from a specified date, with hardly any exception, by banking and other sectors already faced with peculiar , practically insurmountable problems/impediments in their own way.
    It is anybody’s guess, and only future can tell, whether or not accounting cum law experts have at all made adequate homework beforehand in bringing about, and also mandating, such changes; and done so, after giving the utmost mindful consideration, and weight age as due, to the most critical aspect of all, namely, the ‘social purpose’ / ‘societal objective’ it could be expected to serve / accomplish from a multi dimensional point of view, in times to come.
    Above sporadic thoughts , founded wholly on ‘common sense’ , are left open to be fine- tuned by eminent law and accounting experts at large, if so care to, with a view to elucidation and appreciation by the truly concerned / having ‘vested interests’ .

Top Posts & Pages


Recent Comments


web analytics

Social Media