In a very interesting decision that could have significant implications for restructuring companies, the Authority for Advance Rulings [“AAR”] has discussed several controversies in connection with restructuring schemes. The decision, Re Dana Corporation (decided November 30, 2009), is available here. The applicant, Dana Corporation, was incorporated in the USA. As part of its extensive worldwide...
Yet Another Controversy over Section 14A
Earlier posts here had discussed the decision of a Special Bench of the Bombay ITAT in Daga Capital and the possible inequities that could result from its interpretation of section 14A. The most significant one was that expenditure could be disallowed even if no nexus was established between the expenditure and tax-free investment income. To quote from an earlier post explaining the inequity...
Auxiliary Activities and Permanent Establishments
We have discussed on several occasions the extent to which a liaison office of an MNC is taxed, and more generally, the concept of a “permanent establishment”. A series of decisions in 2009 has introduced some clarity in the analysis of what constitutes a permanent establishment and what does not. To briefly recapitulate, although s. 9(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, enumerates circumstances...
‘Business connection’, ‘Attribution’ and the withdrawal of Circular 23 of 1969
Through Circular No. 7 of 2009, the CBDT has withdrawn Circular No. 23 of 1969 (“Circular 23”). Circular 23 explained the position relating to ‘business connection’ under Section 9 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Circular was relied upon in the arguments in the Morgan Stanley case before the Supreme Court; as also by the Bombay High Court in SET Satellite. These decisions had laid down the broad...
A Reiteration of Separate Legal Entity
A recent decision of the Punjab and Haryana High Court in CIT v. Panchratan Hotels has re-emphasised the notion of separate legal entity, albeit in the context of the law of taxation. Here, the assessee was Panchratan Hotels, and had declared losses for the said assessment year. On 31.7.1992, the shareholders of the company had changed, through a transfer of 100% shareholding from the original...
Supreme Court Reaffirms Dharmendra Textiles
Earlier posts here have considered the issue of whether the penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 is a criminal, quasi-criminal or civil liability, which in turn has implications on whether mens rea is needed for awarding penalty under the section. The Supreme Court had held in Dilip Shroff that mens rea is needed for the non-disclosure of penalty to result in penalty, but...
Capital Gains and the Cost of Acquisition
A recent post examined the decision of the Bombay High Court in Techno Shares which adopted a new stance on the law of depreciation. Soon after this decision, the Mumbai Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal seems to have marked another point of departure in relation to the taxation of capital assets, this time on the issue of capital gains tax. The issue before the Tribunal in Bomi S...
FDI from Cayman Islands: Recent Changes
In an article titled “Investing in India: How Recent Developments in the Cayman Islands Facilitate Inbound Investment”, Chetan Nagendra examines two recent events: Cayman Islands’ acceptance as a full member of IOSCO and its recognition in the ‘white list’ of jurisdictions that have substantially implemented the OECD tax standard. He notes that these events are likely to see a further flow of...
A Change in the Law of Depreciation
A recent decision of the Bombay High Court in CIT v. M/s Techno Shares & Stocks Ltd. seems to have greatly narrowed down the scope of depreciation under the Income Tax Act. Although the issue before the Court was only whether depreciation can be granted on a Bombay Stock Exchange Membership Card, the rationale of the decision is likely to have significant implications for the law of...
Taxation of non-residents: More controversy
This blog has covered the controversy surrounding the taxation of Indian companies for engaging services from abroad. A recent decision of the Karnataka High Court has made the law even more difficult to ascertain. The decision is that of a Division Bench of the Court, in Jindal Thermal Power Co. Ltd. v. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax. To briefly recapitulate, taxable income under the Income...
Recent Comments