Tag: Takeover Regulations
-
Supreme Court on Takeover Offer Price
Normal 0 false false false EN-US JA X-NONE /* Style Definitions */ table.MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name:”Table Normal”; mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0; mso-tstyle-colband-size:0; mso-style-noshow:yes; mso-style-priority:99; mso-style-parent:””; mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt; mso-para-margin:0in; mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:12.0pt; font-family:”Times New Roman”;} Under the SEBI (Substantial Acquisition of Shares and Takeovers) Regulations (both under the current version of 2011 and previous version of 1997), takeover offers…
-
SEBI Adjudication Order: Disclosure of Encumbrances Over Shares
The SEBI (Substantial Acquisition of Shares and Takeovers) Regulations, 2011 (the “SAST Regulations”) contains provisions in Reg. 31 that requires promoters of a company to disclose to the company and the stock exchanges the details of shares encumbered by them and also any invocation or release of encumbrance. The genesis of the requirement to disclose…
-
SEBI Consultation: Forfeiture of Shares and Impact on Takeover Regulations
SEBI has issued a Discussion Paper on “Review of policy relating to forfeiture of partly paid-up shares – Amendments to SEBI (Substantial Acquisition of Shares and Takeovers) Regulations, 2011”. The paper opens with references to partly-paid shares and forfeiture of unpaid capital as provided under the Companies Act, 2013. Essentially, in case of partly paid…
-
Lenders Empowered to Take Control over Distressed Firms
The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) yesterday conferred a significant power to banks to acquire control of borrower companies which fail to achieve prescribed milestones as part of their restructuring. Under this arrangement, the Joint Lenders’ Forum (or JLF, formed for the purpose of addressing distressed assets) may “convert the whole or part of the…
-
Voting Agreements and Takeover Regulations
Earlier this week, SEBI issued an informal guidance based on a request by the promoters of Cipla Limited on the implications of voting agreements under the SEBI (Substantial Acquisition of Shares and Takeovers) Regulations, 2011 (the “Takeover Regulations”). Background; Facts The brief facts are that Dr. Y.K. Hamied and his family members control a significant…
-
SEBI Amends Delisting, Takeovers and Buyback Regulations
[The following post is contributed by Yogesh Chande, who is an Associate Partner with Economic Laws Practice, Advocates & Solicitors. Views of the author are personal. SEBI has with effect from 24 March 2015 amended the following regulations: (a) SEBI (Delisting of Equity Shares) Regulations, 2009 (“Delisting Regulations”); (b) SEBI (Substantial Acquisition of Shares and Takeovers)…
-
RIP: Henry Manne
This past weekend witnessed the passing away of Henry Manne, one of the doyens of the law and economics movement and corporate law generally. He was 86. I remember Manne for his seminal work on hostile takeovers and the market for corporate control, which is contained in his 1965 article “Mergers and the Market for…
-
Invocation of pledge by PFI requires disclosure under SEBI regulations
[The following post is contributed by Supreme Waskar, partner at Sterling Associates, Mumbai] The Securities Appellate Tribunal (SAT) has upheld the order of SEBI against SICOM Ltd. (“SICOM”) imposing penalty of Rs. 5 lakhs for non-disclosure of acquisition pursuant to the invocation of a pledge under regulations 29(1) and 29(2) of the Securities and Exchange…
-
Supreme Court on Non-Compete Fee Under the Takeover Regulations
[The following post is contributed by Yogesh Chande, Associate Partner, Economic Laws Practice. Views are personal] The Supreme Court passed an order setting aside the Securities Appellate Tribunal (SAT) decision [and order of SEBI] on payment of “non-compete” fee under the erstwhile SEBI (Substantial Acquisition of Shares and Takeovers) Regulations, 1997 (SEBI Takeover Regulations) Background…
-
SAT on Withdrawal of a Takeover Offer
Once an acquirer makes an open offer under the SEBI Takeover Regulations, it has to meet a high standard (somewhat similar to frustration) before it is allowed to withdraw such an offer. This principle has been laid down by the Supreme Court in two cases, i.e. Nirma Industries/ Shree Rama Multi Tech and Akshya Infrastructure/…
