Can it be said that just because the Accounting Standards are not complied with, the accounts of a company do not present a true and fair picture of its financial position? Is compliance with the Accounting Standards mandatory, or are certain deviations justified? The Supreme Court’s observations in JK Industries v. Union of India, [2008] 143 Comp Cas 325 (SC), appeared to have settled the issue...
Towards evolving Global Corporate Governance Standards
In a recent article, Mr. Umakanth drew a distinction between ‘insider’ and ‘outsider’ models of corporate governance, and argued that “…the current regime on corporate governance has been transplanted from jurisdictions which display diffused shareholding and hence is inappropriate to the Indian regime which is dominated by promoter-controlled companies. What is necessary is a...
Contestability of Corporate Control
In a column in the Business Standard, Nitin Desai argues that the current ecosystem in India provides greater benefits to corporate control, resulting in a number of large Indian companies being managed by the promoter-owners. Corporate control may be susceptible to challenge if there is a market for control facilitated by a liberal takeover regime. However, as we have seen (here and here), the...
SEBI’s Proposed Changes on Disclosures and Audit Norms
After the Satyam fraud earlier this year, there was expectation of significant regulatory changes that strengthen corporate governance, disclosure and audit norms in India companies. Some changes did occur almost immediately; for instance, detailed measures were introduced favouring disclosure of pledges by promoters. However, the Companies Bill, 2009 introduced in Parliament a few weeks ago did...
Corporate Frauds; Earnings Management
One question that does not seems to have been fully answered in the last few months is whether the Satyam episode is truly an aberration or whether it is just the tip of the iceberg (thereby signalling a systemic problem generally in several Indian companies). The Economic Times has an interesting report on various types of frauds that are practised in Indian companies and the role of various...
The Efficacy of Conventional Corporate Governance Instruments
Each time there is a corporate governance scandal (whether in India or elsewhere), the response has been to use a set of instruments (implemented through regulation or best practices) to avoid a repetition of such occurrences. It appears that these instruments have not always been successful as they come with certain innate limitations, but they are often applied in situations that are different...
The Tale of the Resigning Director
In the aftermath of events that occurred at Satyam and Nagarjuna Finance, there has been a mass exodus of independent non-executive directors from boards of Indian listed companies. More often that not, there is no apparent reason offered for resignation by such directors. As we had discussed in an earlier post, the SGX in Singapore has specified a template for notice of resignation of directors...
The Duties of Non-Executive Directors
Earlier discussions on corporate governance norms have raised questions about the role of independent non-executive directors in maintaining appropriate standards of governance. In this context, a recent Australian judgment indicates the nature of duties which a non-executive director may be required to discharge. Australian Securities and Investment Commission v. MacDonald involved a situation...
The Convergence Debate and Indian Corporate Governance
An interesting article by Afra Afsharipour (UC Davis School of Law) titled Corporate Governance Convergence: Lessons from the Indian Experience is available on SSRN. Here is the abstract: Over the past two decades, corporate governance reforms have emerged as a central focus of corporate law in countries across the development spectrum. Various legal scholars studying these reform efforts have...
The Practice of Corporate Governance in India
As far as corporate governance is concerned, although there are detailed norms on paper in the form of Clause 49 of the listing agreement, what matters is their implementation in practice. There are limits to legislating on corporate governance as a lot depends on the integrity and ethical values of various corporate players such as directors, managers, promoters and other stakeholders. There is...
Recent Comments