[Rahul Machaiah is a lawyer from Karnataka. He holds an LLM in Law & Development from Azim Premji University] On 29 January, 2021, a Division Bench of the Karnataka High Court held in UM Ramesh Rao v Union Bank of India that a coffee plantation is not ‘agricultural land’ under section 31(i) of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security...
The Reliance Open Offer Penalty: ‘Unexplained’ Delays in Regulatory Action
Shikhar Aggarwal is a 3rd year B.A.LL.B. (Hons.) student at National Law University, Delhi] On 7 April 2021, the Adjudicating Officer (“AO”) of the Securities and Exchange Board of India (“SEBI”) imposed a monetary penalty of ₹25 crore jointly on 34 entities, including brothers Mukesh and Anil Ambani and other promoters of Reliance Industries Limited (“RIL”), for their failure to comply with the...
Analysing the Oppression Remedy in India: Is it “Just and Equitable”?
[Devika Bansal and Naina Bora are third-year law students at Gujarat National Law University, Gandhinagar] Spanning over a four-year period, the dispute in Tata Consultancy Services Limited v. Cyrus Investments Pvt. Ltd. recently came to an end with the Indian Supreme Court (“SC”) dismissing allegations of oppression and mismanagement. This SC judgement has highlighted...
Call for Papers: NLUJ Law Review
[Announcement on behalf of the NLUJ Law Review] NLUJ Law Review is the flagship journal of National Law University, Jodhpur, established with the objective of promoting academic research and fostering debate on contemporary legal issues. It is a bi-annual, double-blind student reviewed and edited journal, focusing on an inter-disciplinary approach towards legal writing. The remit of the Review is...
Indian Parties without an Indian Court: The Verdict in PASL Wind Solutions
[Abhi Udai Singh Gautam and Mustafa Rajkotwala are third-year law students at NALSAR University of Law, Hyderabad] The Supreme Court (‘SC’) has recently settled a fundamental question of arbitration law in PASL Wind Solutions Private Ltd v GE Power Conversion India Private Limited (‘PASL v. GE’), by determining that two Indian Parties are, in fact, capable of validly entering into a foreign...
Erstwhile Creditors and their Continued Participation in the Committee of Creditors
[Chandni Ghatak is an advocate practicing in New Delhi.] Recently, the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, Chennai (“NCLAT”) in Mr. KN Rajakumar v. V. Nagarajanallowed the resolution professional to reconvene a meeting of the committee of creditors (“CoC”) as it stood in the year 2017 at the time of initiating CIRP against the corporate debtor. This was ordered to enable the CoC to consider...
The Evolution of Risk Management Oversight by Indian Boards
[Afra Afsharipour is Senior Associate Dean for Academic Affairs & Professor of Law at UC Davis School of Law and Manali Paranjpe a Research Associate at The Conference Board, India] Across the globe, the focus on effective risk management has intensified over the past two decades as major corporations have experienced risk management failures due to excessive financial risk taking...
Analyzing the Conundrum of Priority inter-se Secured Creditors during Liquidation
[Nishant Nagori and Divyani Saldi are 2nd year students at Rajiv Gandhi National University of Law, Punjab] The raison-d’être of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 is to balance the interest of all the stakeholders during the insolvency as well as liquidation process. However, the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (“NCLAT”) recently in Technology Development Board v. Anil Goel provided a...
BR Foundation’s Online Certificate Course on International Dispute Settlement [May 28-May 31]
[Announcement on behalf of the BR Foundation] BR Foundation is conducting an online certificate course on the International Dispute Settlement from May 28 to May 31, 2021. About the Course This course is an annual 4-day course on “International Dispute Settlement” especially focusing on the developments and growing relevance of international dispute settlement mechanism all around the...
Applicability of Section 29A to Pre-Packaged Insolvency Resolution of MSMEs
[Tushar Kumar is an Associate at Ernst Young Global Delivery Services] Section 29A of the Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC) makes certain persons ineligible to buy the assets of the insolvent corporate debtor, owing to the fact that they are either undesirable or have, due to their misconduct in the past, contributed to the present insolvency of the corporate debtor. It is pertinent to...
Recent Comments