[Deevanshu Jaswani is a 4th year B.A. LL.B. (Hons.) student at National Law University, Odisha.] This post attempts to analyse two different judgments to highlight that in IBC, the role of the adjudicating authorities has been clearly specified. According to section 7(5) of the IBC, only two options are provided to the adjudicating authorities while dealing with the petition to initiate Corporate...
Amazon-Future Group: More Reasons Call to Question the Delhi HC Division Bench Ruling
[Velpula Audityaa is an Advocate practicing before the Madras High Court and trial courts in Chennai. The author is thankful to Nirmal Prasad (Advocate, Delhi High Court) for his inputs on this post] In an earlier post, a Delhi High Court division bench’s order dated 5 January 2022 in staying the arbitral proceedings between Amazon and the Future Group before a SIAC tribunal, was rightly...
Regulating the Honchos of the Online World – Big Tech Dominance
[Nityesh Dadhich is a IV year B.A., LL.B(Hons.) student at National Law University Delhi] On 20 January 2022, the U.S. Senate approved the American Innovation and Choice Online Bill. The Bill aims to control the abuse of dominance by ‘covered platforms’ operating over the internet. Section 2(h)(3) of the Bill defines ‘covered platform’ as the online platform having at least fifty million US-based...
Ad-Hoc Arbitrations In India And The Fourth Schedule – The Way Forward
[Ramkishore Karanam is an Advocate practising at the Madras High Court and Akash Santosh Loya is an Advocate practising at the Bombay High Court] Recently, the Supreme Court pulled up a Public Sector Undertaking (“PSU”) for haggling over the arbitral fees of an Arbitral Tribunal consisting of retired judges and expressed its intention to initiate contempt proceedings if the PSU continued to...
DLF Home Developers v. Rajapura Homes: A Critical Analysis
[Anushka Juneja is a 2nd year B.A., LL.B. (hons.) student at Gujarat National Law University] Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (“Arbitration Act”) empowers the courts to appoint an arbitrator in case any dispute arises between the parties. For the purpose of the aforementioned section, the power is confined to the examination of the existence of an arbitration agreement as...
App Store: Bridge between Users and Developers or Market Monopoliser?
[Amiya Krishna Upadhyay and Arnab Chakraborty are 4th Year B.A., LL.B. (Hons.) and B.B.A., LL.B. (Hons.) students respectively at National Law University Odisha] On 31 December, 2021, the Competition Commission of India (CCI) directed the Director General to probe into the functioning of the App Store and corresponding in-app purchases (IAP) of the Silicon Valley giant. The allegations of the...
Envirad Projects Case: Crystalizing the Post-Perkins Position on Unilateral Arbitrator Appointments
[Sumit Chatterjee is a final year student at the National Law School of India University (NLSIU), Bangalore] On 18 January 2022, a single judge of the Delhi High Court upheld the prohibition on unilateral appointment of arbitrators by parties in Envirad Projects v NTPC Ltd., rejecting the validity of the arbitral clause providing NTPC with the exclusive right to appoint the sole arbitrator. The...
LIBOR Transition: Reassessing the Risks and the Viability of Alternative Reference Rates
[Mukund Arora is a second-year BBA LL.B. (Hons.) student at the Symbiosis Law School, Pune] London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) was a benchmark rate used to price lending transactions among major global banks in the international market. It demonstrated the borrowing costs between banks on unsecured terms. According to the Federal Reserve System, it was utilized to price financial products...
Revisiting India’s Gas Imbalance Regulations
[Krishna Agarwal is a 3rd year BA LLB Hons. student at Gujarat National Law University] The Government of India envisages augmenting its gas-based economy from the existing 6% to 15% by 2030. To achieve this goal, the Government of India made certain structural changes in the gas-market. Gas imbalance is a phenomenon where there exists a difference between the quantity of gas delivered at the...
Parent’s Duty of Care in Relation to a Subsidiary: India and Beyond
[Radhika Ghosh and Yatin Gaur are 3rd year B.A. L.L.B (Hons.) students at Hidayatullah National Law University in Raipur.] The English Supreme Court has yet again in the recent decision of Okpabi v Royal Dutch Shell considered the question of the jurisdictional challenges associated with claims being brought in England against a UK domiciled parent for the actions of its foreign subsidiary. The...
Recent Comments