[Soham Banerjee is a 4th year student in the B.L.S LLB Program at Government Law College, Mumbai] Introduction A Division Bench of the Supreme Court on March 15, 2018 held in the case of Board of Control for Cricket in India v. Kochi Cricket Pvt. Ltd. that the nature of the Arbitration and Conciliation (Amendment) Act, 2015 (the ‘Amendment Act’) is prospective in its operation and held that it...
CCI’s Order Against Cartel Activities of Airline Companies
[Ayushi Singh is a B.A. LL.B. (Hons.) student at National Law University, Jodhpur] Last month, the Competition Commission of India (“CCI”) passed an order in the matter of Express Industry Council of India vs. Jet Airways (India) Ltd. and Others upholding charges against Jet Airways, SpiceJet and IndiGo Airlines for cartelisation under the provisions of section 3(3)(a) read with section 3(1) of...
Effects of The Specific Relief (Amendment) Bill, 2017 on the Law of Remedies for Breach of Contract
[Radhika Indapurkar is a lawyer based in Mumbai] Section 10 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 (the “Act”) provides the courts with a discretion to enforce specific performance of contracts (a) in which there exist no standards to ascertain the actual damage caused by non-performance of such contracts, or (b) wherein the act agreed to be done is such that monetary compensation for non-performance...
Insolvency under Section 29A: Pre-Pack Pools & Independent Review of Connected Party Sales
[Rudresh Mandal and Hardik Subedi are 3rd year students of NALSAR University of Law, Hyderabad] While the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (“IBC”) in section 5(25) initially allowed ‘any person‘ to submit a resolution plan, the moral hazard posed by defaulting promoters buying back the assets of the corporate debtor at steep discounts soon prompted the Government to bar certain...
Supply of Essential Goods or Services under the IBC: Unresolved Issues
[Job Michael Mathew is a IV year student at NALSAR University of Law, Hyderabad] Under section 13(1)(a) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (“Code”), the adjudicating authority is required to impose a moratorium for matters referred to in section 14. Section 14(2) of the Code...
GMR Energy v. Doosan: Pro-Arbitration at the Cost of Sound Reasoning?
[Sathvik Chandrasekhar and Ashwin Murthy are 3rd students at NALSAR University of Law] The decision of the Delhi High Court in GMR Energy v. Doosan (November 2017) is significant on several fronts. One aspect of the judgment that has garnered attention is where the Court, following the position taken in Sasan Power, placed a foreign-seated arbitration between two Indian parties under Part II of...
Testing the Constitutional Validity of the Anti-Profiteering Rules, 2017
[Yash Karunakaran is a 3rd year B.A., LL.B. (Hons.) student at NALSAR University of Law, Hyderabad.] While the aim behind the introduction of the Anti-Profiteering Rules, 2017 was to rein in possible price hikes during the introduction of the General Sales Tax (“GST”) regime, the hastily drafted parent act and the vague nature of the rules themselves have called into question the constitutional...
Viability of Arbitration in Resolving Sports Law Disputes in India
[Advik Rijul Jha is a Third Year Law Student at Jindal Global Law School] In this post, I aim to identify the rising importance of sports law in recent times, and analyse Indian law to determine how disputes arising in this nascent field ought to be dealt with by arbitration and not the normative court litigation process. The resolution of these disputes by arbitration is proposed to be promoted...
Subjectivity or Objectivity? Supreme Court on Implied Terms in Commercial Contracts
[Manjari Rammohan is a 4th year student at School of Law, Christ University, Bangalore] This post seeks to critically analyze the October 2017 judgment of the Supreme Court in Nabha Power Limited v. Punjab State Power Corporation Limited with respect to remedying ambiguous terms in commercial contracts. This case is of vital importance as the Court comprehensively analysed Indian and...
Original Jurisdiction of the Supreme Court in Arbitral Proceedings
[Shubham Jain and Prakshal Jain are V Year B.A., LL.B. (Hons.) students at National Law School of India University, Bangalore] A Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court in a recent judgment in State of Jharkhand v. Hindustan Construction Company (“HCC”) held that even if the Supreme Court retains some degree of control over an arbitration proceeding, it does not become the court of appropriate...
Recent Comments