Tag: Company Law
-
The Debate over Multiple Classes of Shares
Currently, the issue of shares with differential rights as to voting and dividend is in a state of flux. While the Companies Act, 1956 and the Rules issued pursuant to that allow shares with differential rights, SEBI has proscribed the issue of shares with “superior voting rights” in listed companies, implicitly allowing shares with “inferior”…
-
‘Principal place of business’ – Oral Arguments in Hertz v. Friend
An earlier post had discussed the issue in Hertz v. Friend, which calls upon the United States Supreme Court to determine what is the ‘principal place of business’ of a corporation having operations in more than one State. The Court heard the matter on 10th November, and the transcript is available here. Unfortunately, while it…
-
E-Voting in Indian Companies
Public (or retail) shareholders in a company usually exhibit traits that result in “collective action problems”. This refers to the difficulties that arise in achieving consensus among a diffused set of shareholders who do not play an active role in the company. These problems are exacerbated by the heterogeneity of interests and differing levels of…
-
United States Supreme Court considers a corporation’s ‘principal place of business’
An important question, with significant implications for contemporary corporate law theory will be heard by the United States Supreme Court on November 10. The matter in question is Hertz Corp. V. Friend (08-1107), which poses the question of which State can be considered to be a corporation’s ‘principal place of business’. The issue has arisen…
-
Accounting Standards under the New Companies Bill
Recent posts have discussed the issue of ‘true and fair view’ and whether compliance with accounting standards necessary translated into meeting this standard laid down in the Companies Act. This makes it interesting to note that the new Companies Bill, apart from specifically stating that Accounting Standards are mandatory (proposed section 117(1)), also provides for…
-
Compliance with Accounting Standards and the “True and Fair” View
Can it be said that just because the Accounting Standards are not complied with, the accounts of a company do not present a true and fair picture of its financial position? Is compliance with the Accounting Standards mandatory, or are certain deviations justified? The Supreme Court’s observations in JK Industries v. Union of India, [2008]…
-
The Legal Aspects of Dual Listings
There has recently been a fair amount of discussion regarding the ability of companies to carry out dual listings in India. This arises in the context of dual listing as a possible structure being considered in the Bharti-MTN transaction. Generally, dual listings occur when two or more companies (that otherwise intend to merge) continue as…
-
Taxation of non-residents: More controversy
This blog has covered the controversy surrounding the taxation of Indian companies for engaging services from abroad. A recent decision of the Karnataka High Court has made the law even more difficult to ascertain. The decision is that of a Division Bench of the Court, in Jindal Thermal Power Co. Ltd. v. Deputy Commissioner of…
-
SEBI and Corporate Law
Some of the previous posts on this Blog (SEBI prohibits issue of shares with “superior” rights and Shareholders and Their Duties under Indian Law) have generated reactions from readers on a significant issue, which is the role that SEBI has recently been playing in altering provisions of basic company law as far as listed companies…
-
Moore Stephens: Extending Protection for Auditors
Moore Stephens v. Stone & Rolls might well be the most important case on auditors’ liability since Caparo v. Dickman . The House of Lords, by a narrow majority, extended the protection which Caparo offers to auditors even further. The facts, as detailed by Lord Phillips, were that the sole “directing mind” of a company…
