Tag: Company Law
-
The Court of Appeal Reaffirms the Sanctity of the Corporate Form
Few issues have proved to be more controversial than the strength of the principle that the company is a separate legal entity. The exceptions to the principle – commonly referred to as “lifting” or “piercing” the corporate veil – are both statutory and judge-made. The statutory exceptions are, in the main, not controversial. However, while…
-
Political Contributions by Companies
Last week, the U.S. Supreme Court pronounced an important judgment in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission on the issue of political spending by corporations in elections. The New York Times has a summary: Overruling two important precedents about the First Amendment rights of corporations, a bitterly divided Supreme Court on Thursday ruled that the…
-
Duties of an Official Liquiator: TCI Distribution v. OL
I had previously posted on a decision of a Single Judge of the Madras High Court on the role and duties of an Official Liquidator. The facts in TCI Distribution Centres v. Official Liquidator (C.A. 1953/2008 in C.P. 526/2000) were that the Official Liquidator had sold certain properties through an auction-sale. The auction-purchaser later found…
-
From ‘Oppression’ to ‘Prejudice’?
In this post, I had noted that the proposed Companies Bill appears to introduce some substantive changes in the law dealing with oppression (covered under Section 397 of the present Act). The proposed Companies Bill, 2009 states, in Section 212: “212. (1) Any member of a company who complains that— (a) the affairs of the…
-
Southern Technologies and Sticky Interest – Part II
We discussed the recent decision of the Supreme Court in Southern Technologies that rejected a challenge to the constitutionality of ss. 36(1)(vii) and 43D of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Court held that non-banking-financial institutions [“NBFC”] must account as income interest received from loans that are, for commercial purposes, bad debts. Four important issues…
-
MCA 2009
The previous post highlighted some of the key developments in corporate law and related aspects last year. Since then, I came across a year-end review published by the Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA) that details the progress it made last year. While there have been several steps towards easing the procedures for doing business, the…
-
The RTI and Income Tax Returns
The recent decision of the Central Information Commission in the Escorts case, has led to many raised eyebrows. In sum, the CIC held in Mr. Rakesh Gupta v. Public Information Officers (Decision No. CIC/LS/A/2009/000647/SG/5887, available here), that the information submitted to the Income Tax Department by a company cannot be personal information, and even personal…
-
“Consent in writing” and Standing for Oppression and Mismanagement: Section 399(3)
Having discussed the apparent relaxation in standing requirements under Section 399(1), this post will now consider what the requirements under Section 399(3) are. In particular, the effect of the Justice Ruma Pal’s decision in J.P. Srivastava v. Gwalior Sugars will be considered. Section 399(3) states: 3) Where any members of a company are entitled to…
-
Locus Standi for Oppression and Mismanagement: Dilution of Section 399(1)
Remedies for oppression and mismanagement under Section 397 and 398 of the Companies Act, 1956 provide for some relief to shareholders. However, in order to invoke the provisions of Sections 397/398, the petitioners must demonstrate their standing under Section 399. Section 399, which deals with the right to apply under Sections 397 and 398, says…
-
Derivative Actions – Part I
The issue of shareholders making claims on behalf of a corporation has been a bone of contention ever since the decision in Foss v. Harbottle. However, in recent times, two particular aspects of this controversial area of corporate jurisprudence have received significant attention. These are the issues of multiple derivative claims, and the statutory requirements…
