Tag: Tax avoidance

  • GAAR and Tax Treaties

    [Posted by Umakanth Varottil] [The following guest post is contributed by Dr. Nigam Nuggehalli, who is an Associate Professor at Azim Premji University, Bangalore] The General Anti-Avoidance Rules (GAAR), to be in effect from April 1, 2017, were introduced by the government in a fit of frustration. The government found that many profitable companies were…

    Read more…

  • Scheme of Arrangement & Tax Authorities: The Vodafone Essar Case

    [Posted by Umakanth Varottil] Lately, the income tax authorities have been actively objecting to schemes of arrangement initiated under sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956 on the ground that the schemes are intended to avoid applicable taxes. Such objections are usually raised when the scheme is presented for sanction of the High…

    Read more…

  • Recent AAR Rulings on the ‘Mauritius route’

    [Posted by Mihir Naniwadekar] Normal 0 false false false MicrosoftInternetExplorer4 /* Style Definitions */ table.MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name:”Table Normal”; mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0; mso-tstyle-colband-size:0; mso-style-noshow:yes; mso-style-parent:””; mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt; mso-para-margin:0in; mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:10.0pt; font-family:”Times New Roman”; mso-ansi-language:#0400; mso-fareast-language:#0400; mso-bidi-language:#0400;} Some recent reports have pointed out that the Authority for Authority for Advance Rulings has once again sanctified the “Mauritius…

    Read more…

  • The GAAR Guidelines

    [Posted by Mihir Naniwadekar] One of the major changes implemented by the Finance Act has been the introduction of the General Anti-Avoidance Rules (GAAR). The Government has recently issued draft GAAR Guidelines in this connection, which can be downloaded from here. It is proposed to introduce a monetary threshold for invocation of the GAAR provisions,…

    Read more…

  • The Bombay High Court on applying Vodafone to Sham Transactions

    [Posted by V. Niranjan] In Killick Nixon v DCIT, decided on 6 March 2012, a Division Bench of the Bombay High Court (Dr DY Chandrachud and MS Sanklecha JJ.) has considered the application of the guidance given by the Supreme Court in Vodafone to a transaction that was found at first instance to constitute a…

    Read more…