Tag: SEBI
-
SAT on indirect acquisitions – correct in letter and spirit
Earlier this month, the Securities Appellate Tribunal (“SAT”) opined on the computation of the minimum offer price for an indirect takeover of a listed company. An interesting critique of this opinion was published on this blog the next day. The SAT had disposed of two appeals (Appeals No. 137 and 139 of 2009) by a
-
Indirect Acquisitions and Determination of Open Offer Price
(The following post has been contributed by Avinash Balasubramaniam, who is an alumnus of the ILS Law College and a practising lawyer based in Chennai) The Securities Appellate Tribunal (SAT) yesterday delivered its verdict in the Zenotech open offer case directing Daichi to offer Rs.160/share to the shareholders of Zenotech. So is Dr. Jayaram Chirugupati,
-
Inputs and Suggestions to TRAC
The Takeover Regulations Advisory Committee (discussed earlier) has invited inputs and suggestions regarding suitable amendments to the SEBI Takeover Regulations. This is part of the committee’s consultative process. Suggestions are due in the prescribed format by October 31, 2009. The background for the proposed amendments is as follows: There have … been various prominent judgments
-
SEBI’s Proposed Changes on Disclosures and Audit Norms
After the Satyam fraud earlier this year, there was expectation of significant regulatory changes that strengthen corporate governance, disclosure and audit norms in India companies. Some changes did occur almost immediately; for instance, detailed measures were introduced favouring disclosure of pledges by promoters. However, the Companies Bill, 2009 introduced in Parliament a few weeks ago
-
Revamping the Takeover Code
After consolidating the regulations relating to primary markets (as discussed in the previous post), SEBI has embarked upon the next exercise of revamping the SEBI (Substantial Acquisition of Shares and Takeovers) Regulations, 1997 (popularly known as the Takeover Code). It has appointed a Takeover Regulations Advisory Committee (TRAC) to advise on changes to the made
-
Revised Primary Capital Market Norms
In the 17 years that SEBI has been in existence, the rules pertaining to issue and sale of capital to the public have undergone sea-change. This is not surprising as the nature and size of the Indian primary markets have witnessed significant growth in these years. The primary market norms (post the creation of SEBI)
-
SEBI and Corporate Law
Some of the previous posts on this Blog (SEBI prohibits issue of shares with “superior” rights and Shareholders and Their Duties under Indian Law) have generated reactions from readers on a significant issue, which is the role that SEBI has recently been playing in altering provisions of basic company law as far as listed companies
-
Amendments to DIP Guidelines: Rights Issues and IDRs
SEBI today issued amendments to the SEBI (Disclosure and Investor Protection) Guidelines, 2000 with a view to simplifying the process for a rights issue. Since listed companies embarking on a rights issue are already subject to the disclosure norms under the listing agreement, substantial information regarding such companies are already available in the public domain,
-
Warrants and Voting
My friend Jayant Thakur posted a critique on July 31 on the recent SEBI Order in the case preferential allotment of warrants to promoters. Umakanth dealt with the element of potential prohibition of voting in areas of conflict of interest on August 1. Here is a piece I wrote in the Business Standard today, with
-
Shareholders and Their Duties under Indian Law
Under the Companies Act, 1956, shareholding in an Indian company is almost entirely associated with concepts like rights, entitlements and ownership. This emanates from Section 82, which reads as follows: The shares or debentures or other interest of any member in a company shall be movable property, transferable in the manner provided by the articles
