Tag: Constitution of India

  • Financial Sector Legislation, Anti-terror Laws, Human Rights and the Indian Constitution

    [Posted by Somasekhar Sundaresan] We all now know that the Supreme Court outlawed Section 66-A of the Information Technology Act in a recent order.  I wrote about the court’s core findings in a column in the Mirror publications last Friday. I would have been remiss in not writing about the court’s rationale in the very same…

    Read more…

  • Constitutionality of the Amended Definition of “Non-Performing Asset” Upheld

    [Posted by Umakanth Varottil] [The following post is contributed by Prachi Narayan of Vinod Kothari & Company. She can be contacted at prachi@vinodkothari.com.] The Supreme Court in its judgment dated January 28, 2015 in Keshavlal Khemchand & Sons Pvt Ltd & Ors v. Union of India disposed off seventy petitions challenging the validity of the…

    Read more…

  • Guest Post – The IPL vis-à-vis Article 226: Is it Time to Characterize the Event?

    [Posted by Umakanth Varottil] [The following post is contributed by Sujoy Chatterjee who is an Advocate in New Delhi and an alumnus of the National Law University Jodhpur (’13)] Cricket enthusiasts are lauding the tough stand taken by the Supreme Court of India (SC) against the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) regarding…

    Read more…

  • Delhi High Court on Constitutionality of Court Fee Amendment

    [Posted by Umakanth Varottil] 96 800×600 Normal 0 false false false EN-US JA X-NONE /* Style Definitions */ table.MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name:”Table Normal”; mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0; mso-tstyle-colband-size:0; mso-style-noshow:yes; mso-style-priority:99; mso-style-parent:””; mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt; mso-para-margin:0in; mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:10.0pt; font-family:”Times New Roman”;} [The following post is contributed by Gunjan Chhabra, who is an associate with Singhania & Partners, LLP and…

    Read more…

  • Constitutional Validity of Regulatory Regime for CIS Upheld

    [Posted by Umakanth Varottil] Earlier this week, a single judge of the Calcutta High Court in Rose Valley Real Estate & Construction Ltd v. Union of India upheld the constitutional validity of certain sections of the SEBI Act (including section 11AA) and certain provisions of the SEBI (Collective Investment Scheme) Regulations, 1999 (the CIS Regulations).…

    Read more…

  • Petition on Composition of the Securities Appellate Tribunal

    [Posted by Umakanth Varottil] Normal 0 false false false EN-US JA X-NONE /* Style Definitions */ table.MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name:”Table Normal”; mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0; mso-tstyle-colband-size:0; mso-style-noshow:yes; mso-style-priority:99; mso-style-parent:””; mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt; mso-para-margin:0in; mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:10.0pt; font-family:Cambria;} (The following guest post is contributed by Amit Agrawal, Advocate, regarding a petition filed before the Delhi High Court. Amit is representing…

    Read more…

  • The Constitution Bench elides repugnance and occupied field

    [Posted by V. Niranjan] That the title of this post is a part of Indian constitutional law is explained by the fact that the validity of tax and commercial legislation is often challenged on the ground that it conflicts with a similar legislation enacted by another legislature. Often the challenge is on the basis of…

    Read more…

  • Singur Land Act Held to be Unconstitutional

    [Posted by Umakanth Varottil] Last year, the West Bengal legislature enacted the Singur Land Rehabilitation and Development Act, 2011 with a view to return land to the owners from whom it was previously acquired for purpose of establishing a manufacturing plant for Tata Motors. Since the project was stalled and subsequently relocated to another state,…

    Read more…

  • Retailers Assoc. v. Union: Bombay High Court on Service Tax

    [Posted by Mihir Naniwadekar] /* Style Definitions */ table.MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name:”Table Normal”; mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0; mso-tstyle-colband-size:0; mso-style-noshow:yes; mso-style-parent:””; mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt; mso-para-margin:0in; mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:10.0pt; font-family:”Times New Roman”; mso-ansi-language:#0400; mso-fareast-language:#0400; mso-bidi-language:#0400;} In a previous post, I had briefly mentioned the judgment of a Division Bench (D.Y. Chandrachud and  A.V.Mohta, JJ.) the Bombay High Court, where the constitutional…

    Read more…

  • Developments in Taxation: Constitutionality of Service Tax; and Tax Planning through the “Mauritius Route”

    [Posted by Mihir Naniwadekar] The Bombay High Court has, in the past few weeks, decided two important issues: one pertaining to direct taxation, and the other to indirect. A Division Bench headed by Justice D.Y. Chandrachud has upheld the constitutional validity of service tax on renting of immovable property, as reported by Legally India. The arguments…

    Read more…